Three more states have ammended their constitution to affirm that a "marriage" is between one man and one woman. Now the same sex marriage advocates are in a rage, do they have a right to be?
The "same sex marriage" advocate's argument could be used any number of people. Many a pedophile has said that they are "genetically predisposed" to wanting to have sex with children. Should we legalize pedophilia?
A case could be made that some people are more predisposed to act out violently. Should we legalize violence?
Others have claimed that they have no control over their desire to shoplift. Should we make shoplifting legal?
NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association( has been trying for years to have sexual relations between men and boys legalized. Should we legalize man boy sexual relations?
It is absolutely amazing that it has had to come to the point where it was even necessary to have an ammendment to the California constitution to make same sex marriage illegal. For 150 years everyone in Arizona, California, and Florida already knew that marriage was between one man and one woman.
The GLBT community uses deceitful rhetoric in their desire to force everyone to accept deviant sexual behavior as normal. This is the hidden agenda behind the same sex marriage movement. They compare themselves with the "women's rights movement", or "racial equality movement". This is utter nonsense, and women and racial minorities should be deeply offended by those that are trying to force same sex marriage on society for claiming that they suffer the same plight.
Evidently society has been too tolerant concerning the activities of the GLBT community and now they want to take over the country and force everyone to accept homosexual marriage "whether they like it or not", as the Mayor of San Francisco put it. In my opinion the militant members of the GLBT community should be further ashamed of themselves for the dishonest promotion of their "sexuality".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment